Other
How Evolution Flunked The Science Test
-
-
- Rate this torrent + | -
Download Anonymously! Get Protected Today And Get your 70% discount
Torrent info
Torrent Files List
Torrent description
A short 12 page document exsplaining,
How Evolution Flunked the Science Test.
Recently I talked to a man with a fantastic amount of faith. Not one
shade of doubt crept into his animated description of man's origin and
destiny. He was an evolutionist I met on an airplane. With incredible
confidence he bridged the eons of prehistoric time to explain the
existence of modern plant and animal life. His detailed description of
human ascent from a tiny, one-celled monad was so vivid and
convincing that one could almost believe he had seen the microscopic
amoeba turn into a man.
What is this evolution doctrine which inspires so much faith in its disciples? How
has it turned great scientists into dogmatic opponents of any other viewpoint?
Many evolutionary scientists have united their professional influence to forbid any
classroom instruction contrary to their own views. Does the theory of evolution
merit this kind of fanatical support, which would silence all opposing ideas? When
religious people take such a position, they are called bigots, but scientists seem
to escape that charge. In February of 1977, nearly 200 members of the nation's
academic community sent letters to school boards across the United States,
urging that no alternate ideas on origins be permitted in classrooms.
This indicates that the evolutionists are feeling the threat of a rising revolt against
the stereotyped, contradictory versions of their theory. Many students are looking
for honest answers to their questions about the origin and purpose of life. For the
first time, the stale traditions of evolution are having to go on the defensive. But
let's take a look at what they have to defend. Then you will understand why these
evolutionary scientists are people of such extraordinary faith, and why they are so
fearful of facing competition at the school level.
Spontaneous Generation
How does the evolutionist explain the existence of that first one-celled animal
from which all life forms supposedly evolved? For many years the medieval idea
of spontaneous generation was the accepted explanation. According to Webster,
spontaneous generation is "the generation of living from nonliving matter ... [it is
taken] from the belief, now abandoned, that organisms found in putrid organic
matter arose spontaneously from it."
Simply stated, this means that under the proper conditions of temperature, time,
place, etc., decaying matter simply turns into organic life. This simplistic idea
dominated scientific thinking until 1846, when Louis Pasteur completely shattered
the theory by his experiments. He exposed the whole concept as utter
foolishness. Under controlled laboratory conditions, in a semi-vacuum, no organic
life ever emerged from decaying, nonliving matter. Reluctantly it was abandoned
as a valid scientific issue. Today no reputable scientist tries to defend it on a
demonstrable basis. That is why Webster says it is "now abandoned."
